Emergency aid is a system of coercion. This finding is evidence for its implementation from 1 st April 2004: Relief establishes discriminatory treatment, inhumane, violates the fundamental rights and achieving the dismissed-es in their physical and mental health. Moreover, the threat of cutting aid emergency is used repeatedly and contrary to the SPOP law in order to get people to "consent" to their dismissal. Recently, the SPOP increases its pressure on those rejected, and so focused on those protected by the shelter open by the Collective Right to stay and Coordination asylum-migration Vaud since October 11, 2010. Indeed, the SPOP suppressed for these people the granting of emergency aid and membership in a mandatory health insurance for basic care. Reason: people no longer reside in centers or homes for emergency assistance.
But the obligation of living in a nursing home to qualify for relief, nowhere in the Act on assistance to asylum seekers and certain categories of foreigners (LARA) or in the Support Guide edited by EVAM. This reversal arbitrary policy also poses a problem of equal treatment obvious, because there are people who receive emergency assistance while residing in an apartment. This measure therefore appears as an administrative retaliation falls including the unsuccessful fight in es-es and protected in refuges. It sanctions and those people have found support and a new dignity by trying to further decline.
Climate of double punishment requires in order to be certain that the sanctions take effect, the SPOP doubles the extent of deprivation of health insurance. Persons residing at the shelter were seen removing the cover disease-are granted to dismissed through EVAM. This deprivation of a basic, highly problematic in light of federal legislation (Health Insurance Act), was assigned initially dismissed all single-es. Then in December 2008, the department had Mr. Leuba backtracked, deciding to cover any person dismissed.
Why then decide on a new turn in November 2010 for a targeted category of people? Why deny people their affiliation to the basic health insurance, while federal law provides a mandatory and they are without resources (no-work, under state of emergency aid)? This measure is nothing other than a share of political repression and administrative actions to eliminate some of those rejected files from the State.
The shelter is a public place, known to the authorities. People are not hidden, but protected, knowingly, political and media authorities. It is so hypocritical and completely wrong to pretend that people no longer existed for SPOP. Deprivation insurance prevents people from continuing treatment and preclude their right to review their files, because without insurance they can not gather the necessary medical reports to this procedure.
We demand so that these restrictions be lifted immediately, that stops the administrative harassment on those rejected and that the authorities put their zeal elsewhere, particularly in reviewing applications for regularization of people who live and do live this township for years and can not be deported to a country where they and they are no longer linked.
0 comments:
Post a Comment